BLOG  ·  vendor management · compliance · GRC

BLOG

Manual vendor reviews are expensive. We have the receipts.

Real time-and-cost comparisons between hand-rolled vendor security reviews and the VMS. What the manual process misses, why it takes 4–6 hours per vendor, and what changes when the research is automated.

FEATURED vs-manual 4 min

From 6 Hours to 30 Minutes: A Walkthrough of a HIPAA Vendor Review

An IT manager spent six hours over three days verifying whether a popular workspace tool was HIPAA-eligible. We ran the same review in twenty-eight minutes. This article documents both workflows in detail and identifies the three control gaps the manual process did not surface.

Vensider.io Research 2026-05-10
FEATURED vs-manual 3 min

AI Sub-Processor Disclosures: What to Look for in a SaaS Vendor Review

Most SaaS tools that added AI features in 2023–2025 process customer data through third-party large-language-model providers. This article documents how the disclosures are structured, where they tend to live, and what a thorough reviewer should verify.

Vensider.io Research 2026-04-28
vs-manual 4 min

Three Categories of Finding That Manual Vendor Reviews Frequently Miss

Aggregated comparison data from approximately 1,200 vendor reviews indicates that three categories of finding are systematically more likely to surface in automated, research-first reviews than in manual reviews. This article documents the three categories and their typical impact.

Vensider.io Research 2026-04-24
vs-manual 4 min

The Future of the Vendor Security Questionnaire: SIG, CAIQ, and Research-First TPRM

Standardized security questionnaires (SIG, CAIQ) remain the dominant artifact in enterprise TPRM but produce uneven value relative to the labor they consume. This article documents the structural limitations, the cases where questionnaires retain value, and the role of research-first reviews.

Vensider.io Research 2026-03-31